1. What if an artist creates art in multiples to be able to share his/her art with more than one exhibit at a time. In this way, no one has to wait for the installation to travel from one museum to another. Does doing this lesson the value of the art? Does it even deserve to be called art if it is easily reproducible?
2. An artist creates a piece to be displayed especially for a room in a museum--maybe the acoustics add to the "experience" of viewing the artwork. If the piece became a part of a travelling exhibit, would this lesson the experience of seeing the art in person? What if no one else knew about the special room in the original museum--would it matter then?
No comments:
Post a Comment